What is the proper sequence for addressing potential conflicts of interest in an investigation?

• A. Ignore conflicts until after the case ends.
• B. Only disclose conflicts if the client asks.
• C. Disclose promptly, obtain informed consent, and withdraw if unresolved.
• D. Seek conflicts that benefit the investigator.

Answer: (C)

When a potential conflict of interest arises, transparency guides the right action. The proper sequence is to disclose the conflict promptly to the client, explain how it could affect impartiality, obtain the client’s informed consent to continue with you despite the conflict, and withdraw if the conflict cannot be resolved or the client cannot provide informed consent. This approach protects the integrity of the investigation, maintains trust, and helps avoid biased or compromised findings. Ignoring conflicts until after the case ends undermines ethics and trust. Disclosing only if the client asks bypasses an important safeguard, and seeking conflicts that benefit you is unethical and violates professional standards.