What approach helps ensure investigative conclusions are well-supported?

• A. Triangulate information from multiple independent sources and document corroboration.
• B. Rely on a single source for conclusions.
• C. Base conclusions on intuition alone.
• D. Ignore corroboration when sources seem convincing.

Answer: (A)

Verifying investigative conclusions relies on cross-checking facts across different, independent sources and recording how those sources support each finding. This triangulation builds a fuller, more reliable picture because each source can confirm or challenge others, reducing the impact of errors, biases, or faulty memories. Documenting corroboration creates an audit trail that others can review, which is essential for credibility and admissibility in future proceedings.

Relying on a single source leaves room for unrecognized errors or bias; basing conclusions on intuition ignores objective validation; and ignoring corroboration when sources seem convincing risks being misled by a convincing but false narrative.